Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only carried out If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as the petitioner company responded into the allegations therefore they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by regulation." It is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender as well as Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Also, it may well review an appeal of the decision for which it has granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by the New Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts Should the Commission cannot get to a decision.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed to the disposal of the moment petition to the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner in addition to private respondents and will take care of here many of the areas of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based around the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't persuade the department of his/her innocence.
Various judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name within the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Therefore, this petition must be allowed Read more
The justices must be balanced between the political parties, these that neither party has an advantage of more than just one seat. To qualify to provide about the Supreme Court, a candidate must have been admitted to practice law in New Jersey for a minimum of ten years. This is the same need as for Superior Court judges.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police is to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, guarantee law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to your offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation on the police, they usually must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its numerous pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are necessary to protect rather than abduct. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is not really complete, but this is an excellent starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.